Evidence for which school rooms need action first.
Aeroshi helps school leaders, MAT estates teams and councils monitor selected classrooms before and after ventilation, filtration, retrofit or remediation work, then package the evidence for review.
Designed to support councils, MAT estates teams and funders without creating another dashboard for teachers to manage.
A scoped study, not a sensor-only purchase.
The monitoring plan is built around selected rooms, relevant timings and the people who need to review the findings.
What the school can take into review.
The output is designed for school leadership, MAT estates, council, funder, governor and project review.
- Priority rooms and comparison spaces
- Baseline and post-change evidence
- CO2 ventilation context kept separate from filtration evidence
- Stakeholder-ready snapshots during the study
- Findings, limitations, and recommended next steps
Reference Partner studies from around GBP 8,100.
The GBP 8,100 figure is a Reference Partner starting price for early school-sector deployments. Funded, multi-stakeholder, intervention-evaluation or formal stakeholder-reporting studies are scoped separately. Aeroshi is not currently VAT registered, so VAT is not currently charged.
Typical model includes
- Up to 30 sensors across selected classrooms and shared spaces
- 12 months covering baseline, intervention, and post-change review
- Dashboard access, evidence snapshots, and final evidence report
- Setup and placement guidance for selected rooms
Scoped separately where needed
- Formal reporting or stakeholder review
- Intervention evaluation or multi-site support
- Repeated site visits
- Attendance or exam-performance analysis outside the evidence study
Four phases, one evidence trail.
Baseline, intervention, continued monitoring, report. The room change stays visible, while the evidence remains separate from product claims.
- 1
Baseline monitoring
Monitor selected classrooms and shared spaces before ventilation, filtration, or routine changes.
- 2
Intervention period
Mark when filtration, purifier, ventilation, remediation, or operational changes are introduced.
- 3
Continued monitoring
Compare treated and comparison spaces over time rather than relying on a single snapshot visit.
- 4
Evidence reporting
Summarise what changed, what did not, which rooms need review, and what the data does not prove.
Useful where room-level evidence has to support a decision.
Aeroshi studies are usually sponsored by the teams responsible for funding, estates, interventions, or stakeholder review.
Procurement note, sample RAMS, insurance certificates once arranged, data/privacy review, and a site-specific deployment plan are available during scoping or onboarding.
Short answers before scoping.
Is this a sensor-only purchase?+
No. The device is the monitoring layer. The deliverable is the evidence trail: baseline, comparison, review outputs and reporting.
Does Aeroshi need pupil data?+
No. Aeroshi studies use room-level environmental data and do not require pupil names, staff names, cameras, microphones, audio or video.
Can this support a funding proposal?+
Yes. Aeroshi studies can support project proposals, funded pilots and stakeholder reporting where room-level evidence is needed before and after a change.
Does Aeroshi certify health outcomes?+
No. Aeroshi reports support decisions and review. They do not certify health outcomes, prove disease-transmission reduction or replace formal specialist assessment.
How does a study start?+
Aeroshi confirms the site, rooms, timing, project owner, intervention context and reporting audience, then proposes a scoped monitoring study.
Aeroshi monitoring is designed to support decision-making alongside Department for Education guidance on ventilation and air quality in education and childcare settings, including regular monitoring of ventilation and air quality. Reports also treat CO2 as ventilation context rather than proof of overall safety, consistent with HSE guidance that CO2 measurements are a broad guide to ventilation. Aeroshi provides decision-support evidence and does not certify legal or regulatory compliance.
Discuss a school monitoring study
Tell us the site, rooms, timing, and what decision the evidence needs to support.