Report template

Aeroshi School Indoor Environment Evidence Report

A reusable school evidence report structure for baseline monitoring, before/after intervention review, filtration evidence, ventilation context, and extended monitoring summaries.

Download Markdown template
Report type
Baseline Monitoring Report
Estimated length
10-14 pages
Prepared by
Aeroshi
Template ID
school_evidence_report_v1

Claim boundaries

Do not claim health outcomes.
Do not claim disease transmission reduction.
Do not claim improved exam performance or attendance.
Do not certify legal or regulatory compliance.
Do not treat CO₂ as purifier-performance evidence.
Do not make damp or mould claims from a single humidity spike.
Separate decision-support evidence from specialist ventilation, clinical, legal, or building engineering advice.

Metric interpretation groups

Ventilation / occupancy context

These indicators help show occupancy patterns, ventilation behaviour, heat/moisture context, and whether a space is clearing effectively.

CO₂, temperature, humidity

CO₂ is useful for ventilation and occupancy context. It should not be treated as a purifier-performance metric.

Moisture / damp context

These indicators help identify whether moisture remains elevated long enough to warrant attention.

humidity, temperature, humidity recovery, sustained RH

A single humidity peak should not be treated as damp or mould evidence on its own.

Pollution / filtration indicators

These indicators are more relevant when evaluating particulate and pollution-related changes before and after filtration or air purification. The expected impact depends on the technology installed.

PM1, PM2.5, PM4, PM10, VOC index, NOx index

Temperature / comfort context

These indicators provide context for overheating, cold conditions, large swings, heating behaviour, and comfort-related room conditions where meaningful.

temperature, humidity
Page 1

Cover

Identify the school, report type, monitoring period, room/device count, report date, Aeroshi, and any partner.

Standard

Aeroshi School Indoor Environment Evidence Report. Include school/site name, report type, monitoring period, rooms monitored, devices deployed, report date, prepared by Aeroshi, and optional partner name.

Page 2

Executive summary

Give the reader the answer first in a calm, decision-led format.

Standard

Answer first

Summarise what was monitored, the main decision supported, the main useful pattern, other notable evidence, limits, and the suggested next step.

Required structure

  • Decision supported
  • Main useful pattern
  • Other notable evidence
  • What this does not show
  • Suggested next step
Charts / evidence
  • Optional status striproom status, main domain, watch itemsUse badges only if they clarify the answer; avoid turning the page into a dashboard.
Cautions and renderer notes
  • Before/after intervention impact cannot be claimed unless an intervention date and comparison periods are defined.
  • If reporting purifier or filtration impact, report CO₂ separately as ventilation and occupancy context.
  • Use the combined Aeroshi evidence summary where available.
Page 3

Study objective and scope

Explain why monitoring was carried out and what decisions the report is intended to support.

Standard

Project scope reference

Project type: Baseline Monitoring Report. Intervention status: baseline-only or no comparison windows selected.

This report provides room-level environmental evidence to support internal decision-making around ventilation, filtration, and room conditions. It does not certify health outcomes, legal compliance, or disease-transmission reduction.

Report type emphasis

This version emphasises baseline value, useful comparison rooms, and watch patterns without forcing urgency.

Questions this report helps answer

  • Which rooms showed the clearest repeated patterns?
  • Were patterns local to specific rooms or wider across the site?
  • Did selected indicators change after intervention?
  • Which spaces should be reviewed first?
  • What remains unclear or needs more data?
Cautions and renderer notes
  • Keep this section about decision support, not diagnosis or compliance certification.
  • State whether the project was baseline-only, before/after, filtration, ventilation, or extended monitoring.
Page 4

Monitoring setup

Document the monitored rooms, device placement, periods, intervention status, and data completeness.

Standard

Include baseline period, post-intervention period where applicable, intervention date where applicable, data completeness, and known room context.

Rooms with insufficient data are excluded from priority ranking unless enough evidence exists to support a cautious watch item.

Tables
  • Room monitoring setupRoom name / Room type / Device ID(s) / Monitoring dates / Intervention status / Known room context
Cautions and renderer notes
  • Record sensor placement notes and abnormal events where known; do not infer unknown room use.
  • This table should stay readable; move long device lists to the appendix.
Page 5

Metrics measured and interpretation rules

Explain metric groups and interpretation boundaries before presenting findings.

Standard

Ventilation / occupancy context

These indicators help show occupancy patterns, ventilation behaviour, heat/moisture context, and whether a space is clearing effectively.

  • CO₂ is useful for ventilation and occupancy context. It should not be treated as a purifier-performance metric.

Moisture / damp context

These indicators help identify whether moisture remains elevated long enough to warrant attention.

  • A single humidity peak should not be treated as damp or mould evidence on its own.

Pollution / filtration indicators

These indicators are more relevant when evaluating particulate and pollution-related changes before and after filtration or air purification. The expected impact depends on the technology installed.

Temperature / comfort context

These indicators provide context for overheating, cold conditions, large swings, heating behaviour, and comfort-related room conditions where meaningful.

Tables
  • Metric groupsGroup / Metrics / Primary interpretation use
Cautions and renderer notes
  • CO₂ is useful for ventilation and occupancy context. It should not be treated as a purifier-performance metric.
  • A single humidity peak should not be treated as damp or mould evidence on its own.
  • This page should make the report credible and prevent overclaiming.
Page 6

Site-level overview

Give a readable site-level view before individual room detail.

Standard

Summarise room ranking, steady rooms, watch patterns, priority rooms, top domain, strongest watch item, and stable comparison room.

Tables
  • Ranked room overviewRoom / Status / Main domain / Main evidence / Suggested follow-up
Charts / evidence
  • Room rankingstatus, dominant domain, data completenessUse ranked rows and badges rather than showing every metric for every room.
Cautions and renderer notes
  • Do not show every metric for every room on this page.
  • Keep the overview scannable for school business managers, heads, estates leads, trust leads, and funders.
Pages 7-10

Priority room findings

Provide detailed findings only for the top 3-5 rooms, not every room by default.

Standard

Each priority room page should include room name, room type, status, main useful pattern, decision supported, key statistics, chart, interpretation, suggested next step, and limitations.

Tables
  • Priority room summaryRoom / Status / Main pattern / Evidence / Next step
Charts / evidence
  • Priority room metric over timeCO₂, humidity, PM2.5Select the metric that explains the room's main pattern; do not create full pages for every room unless scoped.
Cautions and renderer notes
  • Use CO₂ conclusions for ventilation and occupancy context, not purifier performance.
  • Use moisture language cautiously unless sustained or repeated recovery evidence supports it.
  • Default to 3-5 room write-ups; move lower-priority rooms into the summary table.
Page 11

Watch rooms and stable rooms summary

Summarise watch, stable, and insufficient-data rooms without overloading the report.

Standard

Stable rooms are useful as comparison spaces. They do not require detailed attention from this report period, but should remain monitored where ongoing comparison is useful.

Tables
  • Watch, stable, and insufficient-data roomsRoom / Status / Main domain / Main evidence / Suggested follow-up
Cautions and renderer notes
  • Do not imply stable rooms are certified safe; they are stable within the selected monitoring period only.
  • This page prevents the report from becoming a raw room-by-room dump.
Pages 12-14

Domain findings

Summarise ventilation, moisture, pollution/filtration, and temperature context by domain.

Standard

Ventilation / occupancy

  • What was found: repeated build-up, slow clearance, time above threshold, and occupied-period patterns where present.
  • What was not found: do not imply purifier performance or health impact from ventilation patterns.
  • Rooms affected: list rooms with repeated or sustained evidence, not one-off readings.
  • Evidence strength: use recurrence, duration, peak, percentile, and data completeness.
  • Suggested follow-up: review practical ventilation routine or room-use context where evidence supports it.
  • Limitations: this reflects ventilation and occupancy context, not air-cleaner impact.
  • Rooms with repeated CO₂ build-up
  • Peak CO₂, time above threshold, occupied-period patterns, and slow clearance rooms
  • Limitations and occupancy context

Moisture / damp context

  • What was found: sustained RH, humidity recovery, repeated high-humidity periods, and temperature context where present.
  • What was not found: do not state damp or mould conclusions from a single spike.
  • Rooms affected: list rooms with repeated or slow-recovery moisture evidence.
  • Evidence strength: use duration, recurrence, recovery pattern, temperature context, and data completeness.
  • Suggested follow-up: review drying, extraction, occupancy, or heating routine where evidence supports it.
  • Limitations: moisture evidence is contextual and may need building inspection or specialist review.
  • Sustained RH, humidity recovery, repeated high-humidity periods, and temperature context
  • Rooms with watch-level moisture evidence
  • Avoid damp or mould conclusions unless evidence supports them

Pollution / filtration

  • What was found: PM events, PM2.5 peaks, duration above threshold, VOC/NOx patterns, and event windows where present.
  • What was not found: do not bury meaningful PM events under generic no-concern wording.
  • Evidence strength: use event recurrence, peak, duration, percentile, room comparison, and before/after windows where scoped.
  • Suggested follow-up: review source activity, outdoor ingress, sensor placement, filtration operation, or comparison windows.
  • Limitations: COâ‚‚ is reported separately as ventilation context and is not purifier-performance evidence.
  • PM events, PM2.5 peaks, duration above threshold, VOC/NOx patterns
  • Treated and comparison room patterns if applicable
  • CO₂ is reported separately as ventilation context

Temperature / comfort context

  • What was found: overheating, cold periods, large swings, heating behaviour, or comfort context where meaningful.
  • What was not found: do not overinterpret normal seasonal variation.
  • Rooms affected: list rooms with sustained or repeated temperature patterns.
  • Evidence strength: use duration, recurrence, peak/minimum, room comparison, and data completeness.
  • Suggested follow-up: review heating, shading, ventilation timing, or monitoring period where relevant.
  • Limitations: temperature comfort evidence does not establish health or learning outcomes.
  • Include overheating, cold patterns, large swings, comfort context, or heating behaviour only if meaningful.
Tables
  • Supporting evidence by domainDomain / Status / Statement / Supporting metrics
Charts / evidence
  • Domain chartsCO₂, humidity, PM2.5, VOC index, NOx indexUse only the charts needed to support the domain interpretation.
Cautions and renderer notes
  • Each domain should state what was found, what was not found, and what needs further review.
  • Pollution and filtration findings should not bury high PM events under generic 'no concern' language.
  • This is the evidence backbone of the report; keep copy practical and non-academic.
Short statement

Before / after intervention findings

State that before/after comparison was not included.

Optional

Before/after comparison was not included because no intervention date or baseline/post-change comparison periods were selected.

Cautions and renderer notes
  • Do not imply causation too strongly.
  • Avoid proved, caused, guaranteed, or solved.
  • CO₂ patterns should not be described as purifier-performance evidence.
  • Show only a short statement when no comparison windows are defined.
Final recommendations page

Practical recommendations

Provide cautious, evidence-led next steps that support school decision-making.

Standard

Recommendation categories

  • Review ventilation routine
  • Review purifier / filtration placement
  • Review room occupancy / scheduling
  • Review moisture source or drying routine
  • Continue monitoring as baseline
  • Investigate event source
  • Select intervention date for before/after comparison

Test one small ventilation routine change in the relevant room and compare the next 7-14 occupied periods before considering larger changes.

Tables
  • Recommended next stepsPriority / Room/domain / Recommendation / Evidence basis / Follow-up
Cautions and renderer notes
  • Avoid legal or compliance instructions.
  • Avoid health diagnosis.
  • Avoid claims that a room is safe or unsafe.
  • Do not direct equipment installation unless it is explicitly scoped consultant advice.
  • Recommendations should be small, practical, and testable.
Limitations page

Limitations

State the standard boundaries of the evidence clearly.

Standard
  • Findings are based on selected rooms and monitoring periods only.
  • Results may be affected by occupancy, weather, room use, window opening, cleaning, purifier operation, heating, and other behavioural factors.
  • Aeroshi does not claim to demonstrate improved health outcomes, reduced disease transmission, improved exam performance, or legal compliance.
  • CO₂ should not be treated as purifier-performance evidence.
  • Before/after findings require defined baseline and post-intervention windows.
  • Attendance, sickness, or learning outcomes are external school-held data that may be compared alongside Aeroshi findings, not claims made by Aeroshi.
  • Results are decision-support evidence, not a substitute for specialist ventilation, clinical, legal, or building engineering advice.
Cautions and renderer notes
  • This section is required in every school evidence report.
  • Keep limitations readable; do not turn the report into a disclaimer wall.

Commercial boundaries

Standard included

  • Monitoring devices for the agreed period
  • Dashboard access during the agreed period
  • Standard analysis
  • Standard school evidence report
  • One review meeting

Optional add-ons

  • Parent-facing summary
  • Governor or funder summary
  • Raw data appendix
  • Custom statistical analysis
  • Attendance, sickness, or exam comparison using school-held data
  • Extra review meeting
  • White paper or public case-study support

Not included by default

  • Bespoke white paper writing
  • Repeated site visits
  • Custom statistical analysis
  • Formal compliance certification
  • Health outcome analysis
  • School network troubleshooting beyond reasonable support
  • Parent-facing communications or PR material