# Aeroshi School Indoor Environment Evidence Report

**School / site:** [School Name]
**Report type:** Baseline Monitoring Report
**Monitoring period:** [Monitoring Period]
**Rooms monitored:** [N]
**Devices deployed:** [N]
**Report date:** [Report Date]
**Prepared by:** Aeroshi
**Partner:** [Optional partner name]

## Report contents

1. Executive summary
2. Study objective and scope
3. Monitoring setup
4. Site-level overview
5. Key findings
6. Watch and stable rooms
7. Domain findings
8. Before/after findings, if applicable
9. Practical recommendations
10. Limitations
11. Appendix, if included

## Executive summary

### Headline finding
[One-sentence headline finding from the monitoring period.]

### What this means
[Two to three plain-language sentences explaining what is going on across the monitored rooms, what needs attention first, and whether this is a baseline, watch-pattern, or intervention finding.]

> Example wording:
> Most of the site is performing within normal patterns. Two rooms - [Room A] and [Room B] - show repeated end-of-day CO₂ peaks during teaching hours, suggesting a ventilation or routine issue specific to those spaces rather than a building-wide problem. The pattern is consistent enough to warrant a focused review before considering wider changes.

### Top priority or watch rooms
Show the top 3-5 rooms only. The full room overview appears in the Site-level overview section.

| Room | Status | Main pattern | Evidence | Suggested next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Room] | [Priority / Watch / Stable baseline / Insufficient data] | [Pattern] | [Key evidence] | [Next step] |

### Recommended next step
[One practical next step based on the evidence.]

### What this report does not show
- [Short limitation 1]
- [Short limitation 2]
- [Short limitation 3]

> Example wording:
> Three of the twelve rooms monitored showed sustained CO₂ levels above [threshold] during teaching hours. This points to a ventilation and room-use pattern in those rooms rather than a whole-site issue. The first step is to review the routine in [priority room] and compare the next [period] before considering larger changes.

## Study objective and scope

This report provides room-level environmental evidence to support internal decision-making around ventilation, filtration, and room conditions. It does not certify health outcomes, legal compliance, or disease-transmission reduction.

### Project scope
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Project type | [Baseline / Before-after / Filtration / Ventilation / Extended monitoring] |
| Monitoring period | [Dates] |
| Rooms monitored | [N] |
| Devices deployed | [N] |
| Intervention status | [None / Planned / Active / Completed] |
| Treated rooms | [If applicable] |
| Comparison rooms | [If applicable] |

### Questions this report helps answer
- Which rooms showed the clearest repeated patterns?
- Were patterns local to specific rooms or wider across the site?
- Did selected indicators change after intervention, where applicable?
- Which spaces should be reviewed first?
- What remains unclear or needs more data?

## Monitoring setup

| Room | Room type | Device ID(s) | Monitoring period | Intervention status | Known context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Room] | [Classroom / corridor / staff room / other] | [ID] | [Dates] | [Baseline / treated / comparison] | [Occupancy, windows, ventilation, purifier, notes] |

Rooms with insufficient data are excluded from priority ranking unless enough evidence exists to support a cautious watch item.

## Site-level overview

### Summary
[Overall site-level statement.]

### Site status heatmap
[Insert a room-status visual. Preferred format: a school floorplan or simple site map with monitored rooms colour-coded by status. If a floorplan is not available, use a compact room grid or ranked list with status pills. Status colours should map to Priority / Watch / Stable / Insufficient data.]

### Room overview
| Room | Status | Main domain | Main evidence | Suggested follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Room] | [Stable / Watch / Priority / Insufficient data] | [Domain] | [Evidence] | [Follow-up] |

## Key findings

Use this section for priority room findings where clear priority rooms exist, or key watch patterns and baseline findings where no priority room exists.

### [Finding title]
Status: [Priority / Watch / Stable baseline / Insufficient data]  
Room / area: [Room]  
Main domain: [Ventilation / Moisture / Pollution / Temperature / Mixed]  

**Decision supported**  
[Decision supported.]

**Evidence**
- [Key figure 1]
- [Key figure 2]
- [Key figure 3]

**Visual evidence**  
[Insert mini-chart for the finding, such as CO₂ over time with occupied-period bands, PM2.5 before/after with intervention date marked, or room comparison chart.]

**Interpretation**  
[What the evidence supports and does not support.]

**Suggested next step**  
[Practical next step.]

## Watch and stable rooms

Stable rooms are useful as comparison spaces. They are stable within the selected monitoring period only and should not be interpreted as certified safe or problem-free.

| Room | Status | Main domain | Main evidence | Suggested follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Room] | [Watch / Stable / Insufficient data] | [Domain] | [Evidence] | [Follow-up] |

## Domain findings

### Ventilation / occupancy
**Summary**  
[What was found.]

**Rooms affected**  
[Rooms.]

**Evidence strength**  
[Recurrence, duration, peak, percentile, data completeness.]

**What this does not show**  
This does not show purifier performance, health impact, or legal compliance.

**Suggested follow-up**  
[Practical follow-up.]

### Moisture / damp context
**Summary**  
[What was found.]

**Rooms affected**  
[Rooms.]

**Evidence strength**  
[Duration, recurrence, recovery pattern, temperature context, data completeness.]

**What this does not show**  
This does not establish damp or mould conditions on its own.

**Suggested follow-up**  
[Practical follow-up.]

### Pollution / filtration
**Summary**  
[What was found.]

**Rooms affected**  
[Rooms.]

**Evidence strength**  
[Event recurrence, peak, duration, percentile, room comparison, before/after windows where scoped.]

**What this does not show**  
This does not prove purifier or filtration impact unless baseline and post-change comparison periods are defined.

**Suggested follow-up**  
[Practical follow-up.]

### Temperature / comfort context
**Summary**  
[What was found, if meaningful.]

**Rooms affected**  
[Rooms.]

**Evidence strength**  
[Duration, recurrence, peak/minimum, room comparison, data completeness.]

**What this does not show**  
This does not establish health, learning, or productivity outcomes.

**Suggested follow-up**  
[Practical follow-up.]

## Before/after findings

### If before/after comparison is not included
Before/after comparison was not included because no intervention date or baseline/post-change comparison periods were selected.

### If before/after comparison is included
| Room group | Metric | Baseline | Post-change | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Treated / comparison] | [Metric] | [Baseline result] | [Post-change result] | [Interpretation] |

**Finding statement**  
[State the observed change plainly within the evidence boundary. Example: PM2.5 in treated rooms fell from [baseline] to [post-change] during the post-change period, while comparison rooms remained broadly stable.]

**What changed**  
[Summary.]

**What did not change**  
[Summary.]

**Limitations**  
[Limitations.]

In the final rendered report, only the applicable before/after variant should appear.

## Practical recommendations

[Use this section to set out a practical sequence of actions. Recommendations should start with low-disruption checks and routine changes before larger interventions, unless the evidence and project scope justify a stronger step.]

### Within 4 weeks
| Room/domain | Recommendation | Evidence basis | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Room/domain] | [Recommendation] | [Evidence basis] | [Follow-up] |

### Within the term
| Room/domain | Recommendation | Evidence basis | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Room/domain] | [Recommendation] | [Evidence basis] | [Follow-up] |

### Longer-term consideration
| Room/domain | Recommendation | Evidence basis | Follow-up |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Room/domain] | [Recommendation] | [Evidence basis] | [Follow-up] |

### What to monitor next
[Optional follow-up monitoring focus, such as priority rooms, treated rooms, comparison rooms, event windows, or the next 7–14 occupied periods after a routine change.]

Recommendations are evidence-led and intended to support internal decision-making. They are not legal, clinical, or compliance instructions.

## Limitations

### What the data tells you
- Findings are based on selected rooms and monitoring periods only.
- Results may be affected by occupancy, weather, room use, window opening, cleaning, purifier operation, heating, and other behavioural factors.

### What this is not
- Aeroshi does not claim to demonstrate improved health outcomes, reduced disease transmission, improved exam performance, or legal compliance.
- CO₂ should not be treated as purifier-performance evidence.
- Before/after findings require defined baseline and post-intervention windows.
- Attendance, sickness, or learning outcomes are external school-held data that may be compared alongside Aeroshi findings, not claims made by Aeroshi.
- Results are decision-support evidence, not a substitute for specialist ventilation, clinical, legal, or building engineering advice.

## Appendix

[Include only if scoped or needed for technical review.]

### Metrics and interpretation rules
| Group | Metrics | Primary use |
|---|---|---|
| Ventilation / occupancy context | CO₂, temperature, humidity | Occupancy patterns, ventilation behaviour, heat/moisture context, and whether a space is clearing effectively. |
| Moisture / damp context | Humidity, temperature, humidity recovery, sustained RH | Whether moisture remains elevated long enough to warrant attention. |
| Pollution / filtration indicators | PM1, PM2.5, PM4, PM10, VOCs, NOx indicators | Particulate and pollution-related changes before and after filtration or air purification. |
| Temperature / comfort context | Temperature, humidity | Overheating, cold conditions, large swings, heating behaviour, and comfort-related room conditions where meaningful. |

CO₂ is useful for ventilation and occupancy context. It should not be treated as a purifier-performance metric.

A single humidity peak should not be treated as damp or mould evidence on its own.